Numerology Part 3 - The '27 Club' and Numerology

Numerology and the ’27 Club’

https://addisabram.wordpress.com/tag/club-of-27/

Today we are going to chat about the ’27 Club’ and how numerology ties in with this infamous group.

Some of you have no doubt heard about this exclusive club. If not then it’s easy enough to google ’27 Club’ and get heaps of hits. Essentially it’s a collection of famous musicians that died when they were 27 years of age. There are also quite a lot of other famous personalities that are part of this list. Numerology would also consider 28 years of age to be a defining moment.

https://from32b.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/day-28/

Let’s look at these two numbers more closely:

·         27 can be taken back to a single digit, as you tend to do in numerology. Therefore, 2 + 7 = 9.

·         If you do the same for 28 you get 2 + 8 = 10; then 1 + 0 = 1.

·         As I mentioned in the second (previous) post, a personal 9 year or a personal 1 year are extremely dynamic years. In terms of personal change, there are no bigger years. In a 9 year you are in the process of ending a complete cycle in order to start anew. The 1 personal year is you living your ‘new you’. I described this as shedding your old skin so a new skin could grow in its place. This is an incredibly sensitive period of one’s life cycle and it can just end up being too hard for some people. Drug overdoses, suicides, acute disease reactions such as heart attacks, are just some of the things that can occur. But why do these things happen?

Well it can be because you are ignoring and/or fighting the change, which has you directly counter to Universal energy. Good luck with that by the way! You can go head-on against Universal energy if you like but you will lose every single time. This is not a David and Goliath story, with you as David and the Universe as Goliath; you can’t win that fight. It’s physically, mentally, and spiritually impossible. Is that a bad thing? No actually! The Universe has your best interests at heart. It will continually deflect your incoming frontal attacks like the world’s best aikido artist. It doesn’t want to fight you, it wants to direct you!

In addition, YOU are a part of the Universal energy you are fighting. So in a way, you are fighting YOU!!

The other scenario is that you are accepting (if not embracing) the change, but the change is HUGE. This can lead to incredible difficulties, which can easily be aggravated by those close to you not liking the way you have changed. So even though you might be in line with Universal energy flow (because you are accepting of the change), there may also be some part of you that bucks the change; and if others are bucking too, then you have a fight on your hands. For some people, this is too hard, and they fall back into old habits and old flow and old patterning, and this opposes Universal energy (which has change on the agenda for you).

There are a number of other possible reasons but for the sake of brevity lets conclude there.

So who are some of the people on the ‘27 Club’?

Janis Joplin

Jimi Hendrix

Jim Morrison (and Pamela Courson – long-time partner of Jim)

Kurt Cobain

Amy Winehouse

Brian Jones

Pope John XII

Joseph Merrick (The Elephant Man)

What about the ’28 Club’?

Heath Ledger

Brandon Lee

Tim Buckley

The Big Bopper

But what is so special about 27 and 28 in particular?

Now according to numerology, at the end of every 9 year cycle you are reborn into a new skin. That means that the years 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 81, 90, 99, etcetera, are all very significant in our lives. And of those ages, 27 and 54 make up two of the most significant. This was previously discussed in my second blog post on numerology.

Also previously mentioned in the second post was the doubling-up/colliding numbers. So if you are 27 years old (9) and you are in a 9 personal year, and you are a 9 ruling number, then you have a serious love/hate relationship with the number 9. The same applies with a 1, as in you are 28 years old (1) and you are in a 1 personal year, and you are a 1 ruling number.

Examples of some 27 Club members

Let’s look at the birth-dates of some of the people mentioned above and we should start to get a better understanding of what I have said so far. I will leave the best till last!!

Janis Joplin

https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/fjo69

Born 19.1.1943 (1 + 9 + 1 + 1 + 9 + 4 + 3 = 28; 2 + 8 = 10; 1 + 0 = 1).

Therefore, ruling number = 1.

Died 4.10.1970 – aged 27 (2 + 7 = 9).

Personal Year number of the year she died = 19.1.1970 (remember that you take it from your last birthday) = 28 = 10 = 1.

So to summarise, Janis was a ruling number 1; she was in a personal year 1, she had three 1’s in her birthdate, and she died when she was 27 (9). All those 1’s occurring together would have been very dynamic for Janis, and if, hypothetically, she had survived until she was 28 (1) it would have been even more so.

Jimi Hendrix

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/uk/london/7992020/Jimi-Hendrixs-London.html

Born 27.11.1942 (2 + 7 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 9 + 4 + 2 = 27; 2 + 7 = 9).

Therefore, Ruling number = 27 = 9.

Died 18.9.1970 – aged 27 (2 + 7 = 9).

Personal year number of the year he died = 27.11.1969 (remember that you take it from your last birthday) = 36 = 9.

So to summarise, Jimi was a ruling number 9; he died when he was 27, which equals 9, and his personal year was also a 9. This trifecta of 9’s was not something that Jimi could have ignored.

Kurt Cobain

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20799054,00.html

Born 20.2.1967

Ruling number = 27 = 9.

Died 5.4.1994 – aged 27 = 9.

Personal Year number of the year he died = 20.2.1994 = 27 = 9.

Similar to Jimi Hendrix, Kurt was a ruling number 9; he died when he was 27, which equals 9, and his personal year was also a 9. Another trifecta of 9’s

Jim Morrison

http://www.examiner.com/article/pam-courson-dies-at-age-27

Born 8.12.1943

Ruling number = 28 = 10 = 1.

Died 3.7.1971 = 28 = 10 = 1.

Died aged 27 = 9.

Personal Year number of the year he died = 8.12.1970 = 28 = 10 = 1.

So for Jim he was a ruling number 1, his personal year number was a 1, the day he died added up to a 1, and he died when he was 27 (9).

And let’s, spectacularly, tie Jim Morrison in with his long-term partner Pamela Courson shall we?

Pamela Courson

Born 22.12.1946

Ruling number = 27 = 9.

Died 25.4.1974 – aged 27 = 9.

Personal Year number of the year she died = 22.12.1973 = 27 = 9.

So Pamela and Jim can be forever linked via the ’27 Club’. Pamela was a ruling number 9; she died when she was 27, which equals 9, and her personal year was also a 9. Another trifecta of 9’s! Pretty creepy yeah?

Now not every person on the lists above have numbers that double-up/collide, in such a spectacular manner as the people I have used in my examples. Some have only one or two. In the end, you just need to have been through a 9 or a 1 year to know just how bloody difficult it can be; and when you layer the same number on top it just makes it that much more difficult, and therefore, that much more rewarding to pull through the other side.

I believe that a challenging life is a rewarding life. I’m never going to be compelled to be the best ME I can be, unless I get thrown challenges. If life was cruisy I would probably just play my PS4 all day every day, and that wouldn’t make me a better person, or anyone around me better people. We are moulded into who we are by what is thrown at us. Some stuff gets absorbed and leaves holes and injuries that we may never get over, whereas some stuff will bounce off us. All these bumps and bruises and scrapes and scratches are my tattoos – my indelible reminders that I am alive and that I am a good person. As my favourite Western philosopher Seneca once said:

“Reckon on everything, expect everything!”

Summary

I hope I made sense with this blog post?

Essentially what I was trying to do was show how numerology can provide insight into someone’s life (alive or dead) using real examples, and examples of people that some of us have heard of before.

There are always going to be pessimists out there (who probably aren’t reading this blog post) that will poo-poo what I have written, but I didn’t write it for them; I wrote it for you and for me.

My next post will be discussing the ‘Arrows of Pythagoras’. Look out for it in about a month’s time.

Love and light to you all